• Traitements

  • Traitements systémiques : applications cliniques

  • Système nerveux central

Pembrolizumab-Chemotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A PD-L1 CPS-Stratified Analysis of Updated KEYNOTE-048 Data

Mené sur 499 patients atteints d'un carcinome épidermoïde de la tête et du cou récidivant ou de stade métastatique, cet essai évalue l'efficacité, du point de vue de la survie sans progression à 4 ans et de la survie globale à 5 ans, et la toxicité d'un traitement de première ligne par pembrolizumab avec ou sans chimiothérapie, en fonction du niveau d'expression tumorale de PD-L1

Based on KEYNOTE-048, pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab-chemotherapy are established category 1 first-line treatments for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1. We compared their efficacy using updated trial data. We analyzed 4-year progression-free survival on next-line therapy (PFS2) and 5-year overall survival (OS) data from KEYNOTE-048 by reconstructing time-to-event data using KMSubtraction. Efficacy was compared in CPS 1–19 and CPS ≥ 20 subgroups using Kaplan–Meier estimates, Cox models, restricted mean survival time (RMST), and landmark analyses. Among 499 patients with CPS ≥ 1, 240 (48.1%) had CPS 1–19 and 259 (51.9%) had CPS ≥ 20. In the CPS 1–19 subgroup, pembrolizumab-chemotherapy showed numerically longer median PFS2 (10.1 vs. 8.0 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62–1.06) and OS (12.8 vs. 10.8 months; HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.67–1.15) versus monotherapy, without statistical significance. For CPS ≥ 20 patients, efficacy was comparable between regimens, with similar median PFS2 (11.3 vs. 11.7 months; HR: 0.95) and OS (14.7 vs. 14.9 months; HR: 0.96). RMST and landmark analyses showed an early PFS2 benefit and a trend toward OS benefit with pembrolizumab-chemotherapy in CPS 1–19, with comparable outcomes in CPS ≥ 20. Pembrolizumab-chemotherapy showed a trend toward improved outcomes in the CPS 1–19 subgroup, with comparable efficacy in the CPS ≥ 20 subgroup, supporting a refined first-line strategy: monotherapy for CPS ≥ 20 to minimize toxicity, and combination therapy for CPS 1–19 to potentially enhance disease control.

International Journal of Cancer , résumé, 2026

Voir le bulletin