Osimertinib plus selumetinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with BRAF alterations post-progression on first-line osimertinib: ORCHARD
Mené sur 16 patients atteints d'un cancer du poumon non à petites cellules de stade avancé avec mutations EGFR et altérations au niveau du gène BRAF, cet essai de phase II évalue l'efficacité, du point de vue du taux de réponse objective, et la toxicité d'un traitement combinant osimertinib et sélumétinib, après l'échec d'un traitement de première ligne par osimertinib
Background: ORCHARD (NCT03944772) was a phase II, biomarker-matched, platform study designed to characterise resistance mechanisms and evaluate novel drug combinations in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following disease progression on first-line osimertinib. We report final results of the module assessing the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus selumetinib (a MEK inhibitor) in patients with BRAF alterations.
Methods: Patients with BRAF fusions or BRAF V600E mutations received osimertinib 80 mg once daily plus selumetinib 75 mg twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety.
Results: Overall, 16 patients received osimertinib plus selumetinib. At data cut-off, (25 November 2024) all patients had discontinued study treatment. The ORR was 7 % (80 % confidence interval [CI], < 1–25); one patient had a partial response. Median PFS was 3.4 months (95 % CI, 1.3–5.4) and median OS was 14.0 months (95 % CI, 6.2–not calculable). Eleven patients (69 %) had grade ≥ 3 adverse events, most commonly diarrhoea (19 %).
Conclusion: Osimertinib plus selumetinib demonstrated minimal response in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with BRAF alterations following disease progression on first-line osimertinib. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with the known profiles of the two individual drugs; no new safety signals were identified. Overall, the risk–benefit profile suggests further evaluation of this combination is not warranted.
European Journal of Cancer , résumé, 2026