Aumolertinib in non-small cell lung cancer with uncommon EGFR exon 19 deletions: a real-world dual-center study
Menée en Chine à partir de données en vie réelle portant sur 118 patients atteints d'un cancer du poumon non à petites cellules de stade avancé ou récidivant et présentant des mutations inhabituelles de l'exon 19 du gène EGFR, cette étude évalue l'efficacité, du point de vue de la survie sans progression, et la toxicité de l'aumolertinib en traitement de première ligne
Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (EGFR-TKIs) show heterogeneous responses in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring uncommon EGFR exon 19 deletion (E19del) mutations. This study evaluated the efficacy of second- and third-generation (2G/3G) EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy in NSCLC patients with uncommon E19del variants.
Methods: This dual-center retrospective study included 118 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR E19del mutations (excluding E746_A750del). All patients received first-line treatment with 2G/3G EGFR-TKIs. Molecular profiling was performed using next-generation sequencing. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed across TKI subtypes and deletion categories. Molecular modeling was performed to evaluate the drug-binding affinities.
Results: Among the 12 identified E19del subtypes, L747_P753delinsS (21.2%) and L747_T751del (20.3%) were predominant, with an overall median PFS (mPFS) of 15.5 months. The differences in mPFS were observed across specific TKIs: aumolertinib (15.9 months), osimertinib (15.5 months), furmonertinib (15.0 months) and afatinib (12.2 months). No difference in PFS was observed between 2G (12.2 months) and 3G TKIs (15.5 months; P = 0.19). The subgroup analysis revealed numerically shorter mPFS for T751-deletions (9.4 months) compared to E746-deletions (15.7 months) or L747-deletions (14.8 months). Aumolertinib demonstrated consistent PFS regardless of deletion subtypes, whereas osimertinib-treated group exhibited subtype-dependent efficacy. Molecular modeling confirmed a stronger binding affinity of aumolertinib than osimertinib across prevalent L747-deletion variants.
Conclusions: This comparative study demonstrated the improved and consistent activity of aumolertinib across diverse uncommon EGFR E19del subtypes compared to osimertinib, due to its enhanced binding affinity and structural adaptability. These findings support molecular subtype-guided TKI selection, aumolertinib as a first-line option for patients harboring uncommon EGFR E19del variants, particularly in settings lacking comprehensive molecular stratification.
BMC Cancer , article en libre accès, 2026