Durvalumab in Combination With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Long-Term Analysis From the GeparNuevo Trial
Mené sur 174 patientes atteintes d'un cancer du sein triple négatif de stade précoce (durée médiane de suivi : 86,4 mois), cet essai de phase II évalue l'efficacité, du point de vue de la survie sans maladie et de la survie globale, et la toxicité de l'ajout du durvalumab à une chimiothérapie néoadjuvante
The phase II GeparNuevo trial investigated whether adding durvalumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) only in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer cT1b-cT4a-d would improve pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and patient survival. Hundred and seventy-four patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab or placebo concurrently with nab-paclitaxel once per week and followed by dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. With 86.4 months of median follow-up compared with the previously reported 43.7 months, durvalumab showed sustained significant improvements in long-term outcomes as defined by STEEP compared with placebo regarding not only invasive disease-free survival (iDFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.99]; stratified log-rank P = .0431), but also distant disease-free survival (DDFS; HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.80]; P = .0069) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.79]; P = .0085). All analyses were stratified by stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) at baseline (low [≤10%], intermediate [11%-59%], high [≥60%]). In exploratory subgroup analysis, patients with nodal involvement at baseline demonstrated a greater iDFS benefit (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.144 to 0.771]; P = .01; Pinteraction = 0.045). sTILs in residual disease (RD) could be assessed in 39/71 patients without pCR. Post hoc analyses by sTILs high (>10%) versus low (≤10%) in RD showed estimated 7-year iDFS rates of 92.3% (95% CI, 56.6 to 98.9) and 51.4% (95% CI, 29.2 to 69.7), respectively. Hence, adding durvalumab to dose-dense NACT without adjuvant continuation of checkpoint inhibition improved long-term survival outcomes, irrespective of the extent of pathologic response. This underscores the necessity to re-evaluate the adjuvant continuation of checkpoint inhibition.
Journal of Clinical Oncology , résumé, 2026