Rucaparib for maintenance treatment of platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma: final results of the phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled ARIEL3 trial
Mené sur 564 patientes atteintes d'un cancer de l'ovaire sensible aux sels de platine et récidivant (durée médiane de suivi : 77 mois), cet essai randomisé de phase III évalue l'efficacité, du point de vue de la survie globale, et la toxicité du rucaparib en traitement d'entretien
Background: In ARIEL3, rucaparib maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) and long-term follow-up (LTFU) outcomes (including PFS2: time to disease progression on subsequent therapy or death) versus placebo in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Here we report the final analysis of overall survival (OS; key secondary endpoint), LTFU outcomes, and safety.
Methods: Overall survival (OS; key secondary endpoint) and updated LTFU efficacy outcomes were analyzed (data cutoff date: April 4, 2022) across three nested populations (BRCA-mutated, homologous recombination deficient [HRD], and intention to treat [ITT]).
Results: Patients were randomized 2:1 to rucaparib (600 mg BID; n = 375) or placebo (n = 189). Median follow-up was 77.0 months. 168 patients in the placebo arm received subsequent treatment; of these, 77 (46%) received a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor–containing treatment. Median OS from randomization post chemotherapy for rucaparib vs placebo was 45.9 vs 47.8 months (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58–1.19) for the BRCA-mutated population; no OS benefit was found with rucaparib in the HRD and ITT populations. Median PFS2 for rucaparib vs placebo was 26.1 vs 18.4 months (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48–0.94) for the BRCA-mutated population. Rucaparib numerically improved PFS2 and other LTFU outcomes versus placebo in the HRD and ITT populations. Safety was consistent with prior reports; myelodysplastic syndrome and/or acute myeloid leukemia occurred in 4% and 3% of patients in the rucaparib and placebo arms, respectively.
Conclusions: OS was similar between treatment arms. PFS benefit with rucaparib was maintained through the subsequent therapy line. These data support rucaparib as maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma.
European Journal of Cancer , résumé, 2025