Savolitinib plus osimertinib versus chemotherapy for advanced, EGFR mutation-positive, MET-amplified non-small-cell lung cancer in China (SACHI): interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial
Mené en Chine sur 211 patients ayant reçu un traitement par inhibiteur de tyrosine kinase anti-EGFR pour un cancer avancé du poumon non à petites cellules avec mutation du gène EGFR et amplification du gène MET, cet essai multicentrique de phase III évalue l'efficacité, du point de vue de la survie sans progression, et la toxicité d'une chimiothérapie standard à base d'un doublet de sels de platine par rapport à un traitement combinant savolitinib et osimertinib
Background: Savolitinib combined with osimertinib is a potential novel therapy for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring MET amplification after progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of savolitinib–osimertinib versus standard of care platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in this patient population.
Methods: SACHI was a multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted across 68 Chinese hospitals. Eligible adults with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and MET amplification after EGFR TKI failure were randomly assigned (1:1) to once daily oral savolitinib–osimertinib or intravenous chemotherapy (pemetrexed plus either cisplatin or carboplatin), both in 21-day cycles. Central randomisation was implemented through an interactive web-response system with stratification based on the presence of brain metastases, previous exposure to third-generation EGFR TKIs, and EGFR mutation subtype, using a mixed block-size methodology. The primary endpoint, investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1, was tested using a hierarchical procedure: first in the third-generation EGFR TKI-naive population, and if positive, the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety analysis was performed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Interim analysis data cutoff was Aug 30, 2024. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05015608) and is complete.
Findings: Between Oct 15, 2021, and Aug 30, 2024, 211 patients were enrolled, 106 were randomly assigned to savolitinib–osimertinib and 105 were randomly assigned to chemotherapy, including 137 (65%) of 211 who were third-generation EGFR TKI-naive (69 in the savolitinib–osimertinib group; 68 in the chemotherapy group). In 106 patients in the savolitinib–osimertinib group, the median age was 59·4 years (IQR 54·3–65·8), 62 (58%) were female, and 44 (42%) were male. In 105 patients in the chemotherapy group, the median age was 61·9 years (IQR 56·3–69·1), 55 (52%) were female, and 50 (48%) were male. All participants were Asian. Median PFS was significantly prolonged with savolitinib–osimertinib versus chemotherapy in the third-generation EGFR TKI-naive (9·8 months [95% CI 6·9–12·5] vs 5·4 months [4·2–6·0]; hazard ratio 0·34 [0·21–0·56]; p<0·0001) and ITT populations (8·2 months [6·9–11·2] vs 4·5 months [3·0–5·4]; 0·34 [0·23–0·49]; p<0·0001). Grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in the same proportion of patients in both groups who received the study drugs (60 [57%] of 106 patients in the savolitinib–osimertinib group and 55 [57%] of 96 patients in the chemotherapy group).
Interpretation: The savolitinib–osimertinib combination improved PFS versus chemotherapy in patients with EGFR mutation-positive, MET-amplified NSCLC that had progressed on EGFR TKI therapy, while maintaining a favourable tolerability profile. This regimen offers a potential oral treatment option for this biomarker-selected population.
The Lancet , résumé, 2026