• Etiologie

  • Facteurs exogènes : Environnement

  • Colon-rectum

Using gene-environment interactions to explore pathways for colorectal cancer risk

Menée à partir de données d'études d'associations pangénomiques incluant 85 000 personnes et portant sur 15 expositions associées à un risque établi ou présumé de cancer colorectal, cette étude examine les gènes et les voies biologiques associés au développement de la maladie

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant public health concern, highlighting the critical need for identifying novel intervention targets for its prevention.

Methods: We conducted genome-wide interaction analyses for 15 exposures with established or putative CRC risk [body mass index (BMI), height, physical activity, smoking, type 2 diabetes, use of menopausal hormone therapy, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and intake of alcohol, calcium, fibre, folate, fruits, processed meat, red meat, and vegetables], and used interaction estimates to explore pathways and genes underlying CRC risk. The adaptive combination of Bayes Factors (ADABF), and over-representation analysis (ORA) were used for pathway analyses, and findings were further investigated using publicly available resources [hallmarks of cancer, Open Targets Platform (OTP)].

Findings: A total of 1973 pathways using ADABF, and 840 pathways using ORA, out of the 2950 analysed, were enriched (P < 0.05) for at least one exposure, as well as 1227 genes within the enriched pathways. Data were available for 811/1227 coding genes in the OTP, 241 of which were supported by strong relative abundance of prior evidence (overall OTP score > 0.05). Fifty percent of the genes (617/1227) mapped to at least one hallmark of cancer, most of which (388/617) pertained to the Sustaining Proliferative Signalling hallmark. Our findings reflect previously established pathways for CRC risk and highlight the emerging importance of several less studied genes. Common pathways were found for several combinations of exposures, potentially suggesting common underlying mechanisms.

Interpretation: The results of the present analysis provide a basis for further functional research. If confirmed, they may help elucidate the etiological associations between risk factors and CRC risk and ultimately inform personalized prevention strategies.

eBioMedicine , article en libre accès, 2025

Voir le bulletin