Pyrotinib versus Pertuzumab with Trastuzumab and Taxane in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Chinese Multicenter Real-world Study
Menée en Chine dans un contexte de vie réelle à partir de données portant sur 145 patientes atteintes d'un cancer du sein HER2+ de stade métastatique (durée médiane de suivi : 9,4 mois), cette étude compare l'efficacité, du point de vue du taux de réponse objective et de la survie sans progression, et la toxicité du pyrotinib et du pertuzumab, tous deux dispensés en combinaison avec du trastuzumab/paclitaxel en traitement de première ligne
Background: THP (trastuzumab + paclitaxel + pertuzumab) and THPy (trastuzumab + paclitaxel + pyrotinib) are widely used as first-line regimens for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in China. However, direct comparative data on their efficacy and safety remain scarce. This study evaluates and compares the clinical outcomes of THPy and THP in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive MBC to guide clinical decision-making.
Methods: This real-world, multicenter study analyzed HER2-positive MBC patients treated at five large breast cancer centers in China from 2020 to 2024. After propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize baseline differences, 76 patients were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety profile.
Results: Before PSM, 145 patients were included, with the median follow-up of 9.4 months. The ORR was significantly higher in the THPy group (75.0%) compared to the THP group (56.8%; p = 0.023). Median PFS showed a trend favoring THPy (19.80 months versus [vs.] 15.57 months; Log-rank p = 0.343). After PSM, 76 patients were matched, with the median PFS of 24.33 months vs. 14.50 months for THPy and THP groups respectively. Though the difference in PFS was not statistically significant (Log-rank p = 0.309), THPy demonstrated a higher ORR compared to THP (78.9% vs. 57.9%; p = 0.048). Further subgroup analysis revealed greater benefits of THPy, particularly in patients with prior neoadjuvant therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.261; 95% CI: 0.072-0.940). Regarding safety, THPy was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3/4 diarrhea (26.6% vs. 3.1%) as well as increased rates of neutropenia, anemia, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation, fatigue, and peripheral neuropathy compared to THP.
Conclusion: Both THP and THPy are effective first-line options for HER2-positive MBC. While THPy demonstrates a higher ORR and a trend toward longer PFS, it also carries a higher incidence of adverse events, particularly diarrhea. These findings offer preliminary insights that may help inform treatment decisions, pending further validation in prospective studies.
The Oncologist , résumé, 2025