• Dépistage, diagnostic, pronostic

  • Essais de technologies et de biomarqueurs dans un contexte clinique

  • Colon-rectum

Endocuff with or without artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in detection of colorectal adenoma: a randomized colonoscopy trial

Mené sur 682 participants (âge moyen : 65,4 ans ; 52,3 % d'hommes), cet essai évalue l'effet, sur le taux de détection des adénomes, d'une utilisation conjointe de l'intelligence artificielle et de l'Endocuff (dispositif cilié fixé à l'extrémité du coloscope)

INTRODUCTION : Both artificial intelligence (AI) and distal attachment devices have been shown to improve adenoma detection rate and reduce miss rate during colonoscopy. We studied the combined effect of Endocuff and AI on enhancing detection rates of various colonic lesions.

METHODS : This was a three-arm prospective randomized colonoscopy study involving patients aged 40 years or above. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo Endocuff with AI, AI alone, or standard high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR) between the Endocuff-AI and the AI group, while secondary outcomes included detection rates of polyp (PDR), sessile serrated lesion (SDR), and advanced adenoma (AADR) between the two groups.

RESULTS: : A total of 682 patients were included (mean age 65.4 years, 52.3% male), with 53.7% undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. The ADR for the Endocuff-AI, AI, and HD group was 58.7%, 53.8%, and 46.3%, respectively; while the corresponding polyp detection rate (PDR) was 77.0%, 74.0%, and 61.2%. A significant increase in ADR, PDR and SDR was observed between the Endocuff-AI and the AI group (ADR difference: 4.9%, 95% CI: 1.4% to 8.2%, p=0.03; PDR difference: 3.0%, 95% CI: 0.4% to 5.8%, p=0.04; SDR difference: 6.4%, 95% CI: 3.4% to 9.7%, p<0.01). Both Endocuff-AI and AI groups had higher ADR ,PDR, SDR and AADR than the HD group (all p<0.01).

Conclusions : Endocuff in combination with AI further improves various colonic lesion detection rates when compared to AI alone.

Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG , article en libre accès, 2023

Voir le bulletin