F-Labeled Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Staging and Restaging Patients With Breast Cancer
Cet article passe en revue les données disponibles concernant l'efficacité d'une tomographie numérique par émission de positrons à base de fluorodésoxyglucose (18F) pour la stadification ou la restadification des cancers du sein puis examine les accords et divergences
des directives internationales
To plan optimal management in a patient with breast cancer (BC), accurate baseline staging and early detection and staging of recurrence are necessary.1-3 Representatives from the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) recently published the joint European-American guidelines on the role of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) in no special type (NST) BC, endorsed by several other imaging and clinical societies: the American College of Radiology (ACR), European Society of Surgical Oncology, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), European Society of Breast Imaging, European Society of Radiology, and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA).1 Considering the low [18F]FDG-avidity in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the EANM-SNMMI guidelines focused on NST BC. Guidelines from clinical societies such as the American National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN),4 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO),5-7 and Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) international consensus guidelines8 also evaluate imaging techniques, but they include all histological subtypes of BC. There is a lack of consistency in the optimal utilization of [18F]FDG-PET/CT among published guidelines.
Journal of Clinical Oncology , article en libre accès, 2025